Legal Opinion
Heise v. Olympus Optical Co.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided March 24, 1986No. S85-562PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*2MEMORANDUM and ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
I. Introduction; Jurisdiction
This matter is before the court on defendant Olympus Optical Company, Ltd.’s (hereinafter referred to as “OOC, Ltd.) motion to dismiss and on plaintiff Ethel Heise’s motion to strike that motion to dismiss. The pertinent filings to present consist of the following:
1. OOC, Ltd. filed a motion to dismiss for insufficiency of process, together with an affidavit of one Mr. Koji Suzuki on November 14, 1985. No memorandum in support of the motion was filed at that time.
2. On January 10, 1986, Ms. Heise filed a memorandum in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Oddi v. Mariner-Denver, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1978
- Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, by Change of Name Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Vreeken v. Lockwood Engineering, B.V.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Holmstedt v. York County Jail SupervisorNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007
- Rearden Family Trust v. WisenbakerHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- Turick v. Yamaha Motor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- United States v. Chitron Electronics Co. Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.