Legal Opinion

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Smith

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 2, 1995No. Civ. No. 93-1112-FRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, District Judge:

The matter before the court is the motion of defendants, Kenneth H. Smith, Robert Dene Bateman, William H. Dalton, Jack C. Darley, Stanley N. Hammer, and Robert B. Lorence, for modification of this court’s order of January 11, 1995 to certify for immediate appeal (# 52-1) and for stay of proceedings (# 52-3).

BACKGROUND

Defendants are former directors and officers of Family Federal Savings & Loan Association (Family Federal). On behalf of Family Federal, the Resolution Trust Corporation (the RTC) brought this action for negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Central Savings and Loan Association v. Daniel T. McSweeney Frederick C. StalderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. CanfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Resolution Trust Corporation v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3220, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5304 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a Federal Corporation, as Manager of the Fslic Resolution Fund v. Kenneth H. Smith Richard Hoffman Robert Dene Bateman William M. Dalton Jack C. Darley Stanley N. Hammer Robert B. LorenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API