Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1996No. 95-35312PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Family Federal Savings & Loan Association (Family Federal) was a federally insured thrift headquartered at Dallas, Oregon. On January 10, 1990, the Office of Thrift Supervision determined that Family Federal was insolvent. The Office, therefore, appointed the Resolution Trust Corporation as receiver for Family Federal, and on that date, RTC purchased all of Family Federal’s claims against its directors and officers. Over three years later, on September 8, 1993, RTC, as successor in interest to Family Federal, filed this action against Kenneth Smith, Richard Hoffman, Robert Bateman,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Central Savings and Loan Association v. Daniel T. McSweeney Frederick C. StalderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Resolution Trust Corp. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Jaquith v. FerrisOregon Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3220, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5304 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a Federal Corporation, as Manager of the Fslic Resolution Fund v. Kenneth H. Smith Richard Hoffman Robert Dene Bateman William M. Dalton Jack C. Darley Stanley N. Hammer Robert B. LorenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API