Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. Gilliam
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice.
In this case of first impression, the only question presented on certiorari is whether the trial court erred by refusing to give requested special jury instructions outlining the standard of care imposed on a motorist for the safety of a nine-year-old pedestrian. The court gave the “ordinary standard of care” instruction because No. 10.5 of the Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions-Civil (OUJI-CIV) provided that no special instructions should be given on the care required for the safety of a child. We find that the trial court properly followed the directives of the Oklahoma…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hudson v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Woodall v. Chandler Material Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Javis v. Board of Education of the School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Karashin v. Haggard Hauling & Rigging, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Chapin v. RogersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Brewer v. MurrayCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- IN THE MATTER OF T.T.S.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Martin v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Weekley v. Bennett Motor Express, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.