Legal Opinion
Consolidated Insurance v. Vanderwoude
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided February 9, 1995No. 2:94 cv 205PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY, District Judge. .
This is a case in which the court’s jurisdiction is based solely on diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff Consolidated Insurance Co. (“Consolidated”) seeks a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify under a homeowner’s insurance policy issued to an Illinois homeowner on his Illinois home. One of the defendants, Country Mutual Insurance Company (“CMIC”), has moved to dismiss the case for improper venue pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3).
Taking as true the allegations of Consolidated’s complaint and those in an affidavit submitted by Consolidated in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phillip E. Bates, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Defendant v. C & S Adjusters, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-ClaimantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- William P. Hapaniewski and Edward Janski v. City of Chicago Heights, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Sacody Technologies, Inc. v. Avant, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Concession Consultants, Inc. v. MirischCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Constitution Reinsurance Corp. v. Stonewall InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chiriboga v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
- In Re HendersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1996
- Interlease Aviation Investors II (ALOHA) L.L.C. v. Vanguard Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
- PKWare, Inc. v. MeadeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Caldera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Los Alamos National Security, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.