Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided August 4, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representative Easley

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:

1. Is a bail bondsman responsible for the costs incurred by law enforcement agencies in returning a defendant to the court of original jurisdiction from the custody of another jurisdiction within the State?

2. May a municipal police department or other law enforcement agency prohibit its peace officers from arresting defendants based on a certified copy of the bond when no arrest warrant has been issued?

3. In order to surrender a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Manning v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Acevedo v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State v. JacksonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API