Legal Opinion

Lakeside Pump & Equipment, Inc. v. Austin Construction Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1978No. 44629PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

The principal question on this appeal is whether a contract was created between the parties for the furnishing of two pump stations.

Respondent, Lakeside Pump and Equipment, Inc. (Lakeside), supplied an oral quotation to furnish two pump stations to appellant, Austin Construction Company (Austin). Whether this bid was for Lakeside's standard station or one which met certain specifications was the subject of dispute at trial and provides the focus on this appeal. Austin incorporated the oral quotation in its overall bid on a sewer project in Pierce County and sent Lakeside a purchase order for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rutter v. RutterWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Goodman v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Euclid Engineering Corp. v. Illinois Power Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. Merritt-Chapman and Scott Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corporation, an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. West Coast Airlines, Inc. v. Miner's Aircraft & Engine Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pannell v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. YAKIMA CEMENT PRODUCTS COMPANY v. Great American Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Computer Network, Ltd. v. Purcell Tire & Rubber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Portage Bay-Roanoke Park Community Council v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API