Collins v. Bauman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 93. — PARTITION PROCEEDINGS BY MARGARET BAU-MAN AND OTHERS AGAINST MARGARET COLLINS AN OTHERS. Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court. A. S. Berry, Circuit Judge. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.
Read the full summary
CASE 93. — PARTITION PROCEEDINGS BY MARGARET BAU-MAN AND OTHERS AGAINST MARGARET COLLINS AN OTHERS. Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court. A. S. Berry, Circuit Judge. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal. (No brief in record.) There are three reasons why the paper in question is not good as to bona fide purchasers for value.: 1. As to the property then in his possession, it was not good for want of a sufficient description. 2. As to the property afterwards acquired, it was not good because if it were a conveyance, it was a conveyance of lands in the adverse possession of another and also a…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Lassing
Affirming.
In. 1877 John Wenderoth, a resident of Campbell county, Kentucky, entered into a contract with one *849Martha Schneider in contemplation of their marriage. They afterwards married. The contract was recorded in the county court clerk’s office of Campbell county, in Newport, Ky., and is in words and figures as follows: “That whereas, the said John Wenderoth, party of the first part, 'and Martha Schneider, party the second part, are-about to enter the marriage relation ; and whereas, they are- desirous, before doing so, to establish their respective…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Gentry v. GentryKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
- Spencer v. Estate of SpencerKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Neneman v. RickleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- Ball v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Pressman v. Pressman's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.