Legal Opinion

Curnutte v. Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 17, 1942No. 11186PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is a usury suit. Trial was to a jury, but at the conclusion of appellants’ evidence the trial court peremptorily instructed the jury to find against appellants, J. V. Curnutte and Tom Howard, plaintiffs below, and in favor of V. H. Houston and Lillie H. Houston, the appel-lees here.

We sustain appellants’ first point, wherein it is asserted that the evidence raised fact issues as to the existence of an usurious transaction, whereby appellees exacted and collected from appellants an illegal rate of interest for the use of Three Thousand Dollars.

The pertinent evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Pansy Oil Co. v. Federal Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Campbell v. OskeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Edwards v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Woodman v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  2. Thompson v. HagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Harrell v. COLONIAL FINANCE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. Harrell v. COLONIAL FINANCE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API