Legal Opinion

Harrell v. COLONIAL FINANCE CORPORATION

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1960No. 13644PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This is a usury case. Whether credit insurance and the investment certificate plan are cloaks for usury are the two main legal points. Colonial Finance Corporation, hereafter called lender, sued B. R. Harrell and wife, Annie G. Harrell, hereafter called borrower, for non-payment of a promissory note in the face amount of $468, with interest after maturity, and for attorney’s fees. The note was partially secured by a chattel mortgage and an investment certificate. After a jury trial, the court gave judgment against Harrell but not his wife, for the unpaid balance on the note, ten…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Cramer v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Nevels v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. State ex rel AllredTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Jones v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monclova v. Financial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  2. Harrell v. COLONIAL FINANCE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Monclova v. Financial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API