Legal Opinion

Shead v. Grissett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 6, 1978No. 17099PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Justice.

The sole question in this case is whether the summary judgment proof shows, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff’s cause of action for attorney’s fees is barred by the two year statute of limitation. Article 5526, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann.

The plaintiff brought this action on August 23, 1977. He alleged in his sworn petition that he had rendered personal services on behalf of the defendant and he attached to his petition a statement dated June 24, 1975, for legal services “rendered” on defendant’s behalf in a divorce action, showing a balance due of $670.20. The defendant filed a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zale Corporation v. RosenbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. International Printing Pressmen & Assistants' Union v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Oram v. General American Oil Company of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Cowart v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Wilson v. Browning Arms CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matherly v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Cathey v. First City Bank of Aransas Pass, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  3. Greer Limestone Co. v. NestorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Law Offices of Moore & Associates v. Aetna Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  5. Matherly v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API