Legal Opinion

Holyfield v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1985No. 13967PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*795OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, J.:

In this consolidated appeal, the central issue is whether police officers may subvert a suspect’s constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment of the federal constitution and article 1 section 8 of the Nevada Constitution by bargaining to have a self-interested, twice-convicted felon and escapee conduct a custodial interrogation that the police could not lawfully conduct themselves. We hold they may not do so. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm appellant Townsell’s judgment of conviction, but we reverse the conviction of appellant Holyfield.

The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Boehm v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Avery v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. PerkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Thompson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Mejia v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API