Legal Opinion

Mona v. Sifen

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 13, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00821Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Michael J. Mona, Jr., Case No. 2:22-cv-00821-CDS-EJY 5 Plaintiff Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Closing Case 6 v. 7 Michael Sifen, [ECF No. 24] 8 Defendant 9 10 This is a breach of contract suit. Defendant Michael Sifen moves to dismiss the First 11 Amended Complaint (FAC) for lack of personal jurisdiction, or in the alternative, for failing to 12 state a claim upon which relief can be granted. ECF No. 24. The motion is fully briefed. See 13 Opp’n, ECF No. 31; Reply, ECF No. 32. 14 I previously granted Sifen’s first…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API