Legal Opinion
Elnatanova v. Administration for Children's Services
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 28, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Richardson, J.), dated January 9, 2006, as, after a hearing, directed that his visitation with the child be supervised.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
*803The determination of whether visitation should be supervised is a matter left to the Family Court’s sound discretion, and its findings, to which deference is to be accorded, will not be disturbed on appeal unless…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- James Joseph M. v. Rosana R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Rosario WW. v. Ellen WW.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Nunnery v. NunneryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Kubista v. KubistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Anaya v. HundleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rosenberg v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Bullinger v. CostaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Smith v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kantrowitz v. CummoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Francis v. HolderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010