Legal Opinion
Smith v. Roberts
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 4, 2009PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Negron, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated July 24, 2008, as, after a hearing, granted his petition for visitation only to the extent of directing therapeutic supervised visitation.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
*689“ ‘The determination of whether visitation should be supervised is a matter left to Family Court’s sound discretion . . . and its findings, to which deference is to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Custer v. SlaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Rho v. RhoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Elnatanova v. Administration for Children's ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lorraine D. v. Widmack C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Binong Xu v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Hansen v. BalkaranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Hall v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Diana B. v. Lorry B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.