Privette v. Faulkner
Nevada Supreme Court
1DissentGunderson, C. J.
I respectfully dissent.
The majority here reverse a jury’s solemn verdict, made after assessing all the evidence in the light of their combined wisdom, because the district court declined to instruct the jury to accord special and continuing weight to one item of evidence, i.e., ownership of the vehicle all the travelers were using.
Concerning this, my brethren say that the “weight of authority” recognizes the existence of a presumption that the owner of the vehicle was driving, if such vehicle was involved in an accident. However, while I note that although the majority cite a total of seven…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Rodney v. StamanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Parker v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Rocky Mountain Produce Trucking Co. v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- American Insurance v. NaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.