Legal Opinion

In the Interest of R.C.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1995No. 73,262PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Walton, J.:

Carlyle, the natural father of R.C., D.C., M.C., S.C., and C.C., appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to obtain custody of his children. He argues that the trial court erred by giving precedent consideration to the best interests of the child rule over the parental preference doctrine in a child in need of care action. We affirm.

Carlyle was married to Viola, the natural mother of R.C., D.C., M.C., S.C., and C.C., on June 15, 1978. They separated in June 1989, and Viola commenced divorce proceedings shortly thereafter. The children remained in her custody after the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. SheppardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. In Re Guardianship of WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. Vallimont v. MedfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. In Re ArmentroutSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. In the Interest of CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of RaymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  2. In re Guardianship and Conservatorship of B.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. In the Interest of R.B.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  4. In Re RBSCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API