Legal Opinion

Martin v. Kostner

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1982No. 53,307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is an action by the lessees to quiet their title in certain oil and gas leasehold estates. The defendant-landowners appeal from an adverse judgment by the trial court. The plaintiff-lessees cross-appeal on a single issue.

The factual situation from which this controversy arises is involved and often technical. Although additional facts will be supplied later as needed, the following synopsis provides an adequate factual foundation.

Defendants are the owners of the surface and minerals in and to three parallel 80-acre tracts in Kingman…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Council Grove v. OssmannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Skelly Oil Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. Robinson v. Continental Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1966
  4. Harry Carlisle and Neva C. Carlisle, His Wife v. United Producing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Akandas, Inc. v. KlippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Levin v. MAW OIL & GAS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API