Godchaux Sugars, Inc. v. Chaisson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion
On Application for Rehearing
2Per curiam
In their application for rehearing the defendants are, for the first time, and contrary to the rules of this court and the jurisprudence thereof,1 seeking to raise Federal constitutional issues that were not raised or passed on when the case was originally before us, their contention now being that even though they employed illegal means and purposes in this labor dispute, the injunctions as issued by the district judge and affirmed by us nevertheless infringes and otherwise deprives them of certain rights claimed to be guaranteed by the Federal constitution.
This…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Godchaux Co. v. EstopinalSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- State Ex Rel. Murtagh v. Department of City Civil ServiceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Stephens v. DuckettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Garland v. HolmesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
- Sorbe v. Merchant's InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1833