Legal Opinion

Union Paving Co. v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1919No. Appeal, No. 77PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, No. 77, Jan. T., 1919, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1917, No. 3207, entering judgment for defendant n. o. v. in case of Union Paving Company v. City of Philadelphia. Assumpsit to recover cost of additional grading incidental to a contract for paving a city street.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 77, Jan. T., 1919, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Philadelphia Co., March T., 1917, No. 3207, entering judgment for defendant n. o. v. in case of Union Paving Company v. City of Philadelphia. Assumpsit to recover cost of additional grading incidental to a contract for paving a city street. Verdict for plaintiff for $2,301.92. The court subsequently entered judgment for the defendant n. o. v. for the reasons stated in the following, opinion by Ferguson, J.: We think the verdict in this ease cannot stand and that judgment must be entered for the defendant non obstante…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below granting defendant’s motion for it.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Luzerne Township v. Fayette CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Morgan v. JohnstownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Kuhn v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Willis Bancroft, Inc. v. Millcreek TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Burke v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API