Legal Opinion

Willis Bancroft, Inc. v. Millcreek Township

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1939No. Appeal, 157PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

A written contract was duly entered into by the plaintiff-appellee, Willis Bancroft, Inc., with the Township of Millcreek, the appellant, on December 4, 1934. It related to the construction of a sanitary sewer system of approximately three miles in the township, as a W.P.A. project. It required that the labor be furnished by the Federal Belief Administration, and the materials were to be furnished by the township. The work was divided into three parts. Items 1 and 3 were awarded to the appellee. These two sections were connected by a section known as Item 2, which…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Salt Lake City v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. Collector v. HubbardSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Smith v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Hepburn v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Roseman v. HasslerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. American La France Fire Engine Co. ex rel. American La France & Foamite Industries, Inc. v. Borough of ShenandoahCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Coyle v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. J. A. & W. A. Hess, Inc. v. Hazle TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API