Willis Bancroft, Inc. v. Millcreek Township
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
A written contract was duly entered into by the plaintiff-appellee, Willis Bancroft, Inc., with the Township of Millcreek, the appellant, on December 4, 1934. It related to the construction of a sanitary sewer system of approximately three miles in the township, as a W.P.A. project. It required that the labor be furnished by the Federal Belief Administration, and the materials were to be furnished by the township. The work was divided into three parts. Items 1 and 3 were awarded to the appellee. These two sections were connected by a section known as Item 2, which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Salt Lake City v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Collector v. HubbardSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Smith v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Hepburn v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Roseman v. HasslerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- American La France Fire Engine Co. ex rel. American La France & Foamite Industries, Inc. v. Borough of ShenandoahCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Coyle v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- J. A. & W. A. Hess, Inc. v. Hazle TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.