Bold Alliance v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F()R THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bold Alliance, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 17-cv-01822 (RJL) ) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et ) az., ) F I L E D ) EP 2 a Defendants. ) S 2018 ) C|erk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the Distrlct of Columbia MEMORANDUM OPINION ¢-r__ september ZZ __2018 [Dkt. ## 11, 16, 20, 21, 22] Plaintiffs challenge the F ederal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC’s”) issuance of certificates of public convenience and necessity to defendants Atlantic Coast Pipeline LLC (“ACP”) and Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. Essar Steel Minnesota LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Logan v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Peart v. Latham and Watkins LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.