Legal Opinion

Bold Alliance v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 28, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-1822Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F()R THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bold Alliance, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Case No. 17-cv-01822 (RJL) ) Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et ) az., ) F I L E D ) EP 2 a Defendants. ) S 2018 ) C|erk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy Courts for the Distrlct of Columbia MEMORANDUM OPINION ¢-r__ september ZZ __2018 [Dkt. ## 11, 16, 20, 21, 22] Plaintiffs challenge the F ederal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC’s”) issuance of certificates of public convenience and necessity to defendants Atlantic Coast Pipeline LLC (“ACP”) and Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. Essar Steel Minnesota LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. Logan v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. Peart v. Latham and Watkins LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API