Tanner's Rome, Inc. v. Ingram
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Judge.
Tanner’s Rome, Inc. appeals the denial of its motion for summary judgment, contending that the claim asserted by Mae Nell Ingram is barred by the applicable statute of limitation. Specifically, Tanner’s Rome contends that Ingram failed to meet the notice requirements necessary to substitute a party defendant pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-15 (c). We affirm that Ingram met the requirements of OCGA § 9-11-15 (c), such that the amendment to the complaint which changed the party defendant related back to the date of the original pleadings.
“Summary judgment is proper when there is no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Rich's, Inc. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Harrison v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Urban v. LemleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
3Cited by10 opinions
- Parks v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Fontaine v. Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Khawaja v. Lane Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Matson v. Noble Investment Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Stephens v. McDonald's Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.