Legal Opinion

Grindley v. Town of Eastchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants, Town of Eastchester and New York Telephone Company, separately appeal, as limited by their briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered October 4, 1993, as denied the branches of their respective cross motions for summary judgment which were to dismiss the plaintiffs’ cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6), and the plaintiffs cross-appeal from so much of the same order as granted those branches of the defendants’ respective cross motions for summary judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Copertino v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Celestine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Celestine v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crespo v. Triad, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Houchang Haghighi v. BailerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Bardouille v. Structure-Tone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Cannino v. Locust Valley Fire DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Rottkamp v. American Ref-Fuel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API