Securities & Exchange Commission v. Callahan
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION & ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The Claimants Distinctive Investments LLC (“Distinctive Investments”) and Distinctive Ventures LLC (“Distinctive Ventures” and collectively, the “Distinctive Entities”) appeal from a July 21, 2014 notice of determination (the “Notice of Determination”) by Steven Weinberger (the “Receiver”) denying their claim for $390,496.93.
For the reasons set forth below, the Court affirms the Notice of Determination by the Receiver and dismisses the claims by Distinctive Entities.
I. BACKGROUND
This case involves three parallel actions: (i) U.S.A. v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Briarpatch Limited, L.P., Gerard F. Rubin v. Phoenix Pictures, Inc., Michael Medavoy, Geisler Roberdeau, Inc., Terence MalickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Zervos v. Verizon New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Weiss v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Pennecom B v. V. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch International, Inc. And Paul A. PittmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Mas v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CallahanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016