Legal Opinion
Pennecom B v. V. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch International, Inc. And Paul A. Pittman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 28, 2004No. Docket 03-7774PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant PenneCom B.V. (“PenneCom”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Chin, J.) granting the motion of defendants-appel-lees Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., Merrill Lynch International, Inc., and Paul A. Pittman (collectively, “Merrill Lynch”) to dismiss by reason of collateral estoppel. Merrill Lynch had advised Elektrim S.A. (“Elektrim”), a Polish company, when Elektrim contracted to purchase from Pen-neCom the shares of Pilicka Telefonia S.A. (“Pilicka”). When Elektrim refused to go through with the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Gilberg v. BarbieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Peter Weber v. Pact XPP Technologies, AGCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Torres v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Bermudez v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of AzerbaijanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- CBF Indústria de Gusa S/A v. AMCI Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.