Legal Opinion

Marcklinger v. Liebert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMalone Jr., J.

On the prior appeal in this child support case, we rejected petitioner’s contention that the Support Magistrate improperly considered the parties’ combined income exceeding $80,000 in the calculation of the basic child support obligation for their unemancipated child, but remitted the matter to Family Court for an articulation of a rationale for using the statutory percentage rather than the so-called “paragraph (f)” factors or a combination of both (Matter of Marcklinger v Liebert, 72 AD3d 1431 [2010]). Upon remittal, the Support Magistrate recalculated petitioner’s support obligation, using…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MATTER OF CASSANO v. CassanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Holterman v. HoltermanNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Marcklinger v. LiebertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Smith v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Seelow v. SeelowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Matter of Dunlop v. BowenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  3. Ryan v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Sadaghiani v. GhayooriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Sadaghiani v. GhayooriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API