Legal Opinion

Jerry Deuntay Carr v. State of Mississippi

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided November 24, 2015No. 2014-KA-01481-COAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAXWELL, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant both .the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him and the right to a fair trial by an impartial jury. In Jerry Deuntay Carr’s trial for capital murder,' we find both -of those rights were protected.

- ¶ 2. Contrary to Carr’s assertion; there was no Confrontation- Clause violation, despite the fact the DNA analyst who testified was not the one who' actually tested the blood samples. The testifying analyst had reviewed all testing procedures, performed his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Davis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. William Mack, Jr. v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  2. Terrence Shannon v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API