People v. Anderson
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
I agree with my colleague that the Court of Appeals erred reversibly in this case when it set aside the defendant’s conviction for conspiracy to commit murder. I am constrained to write separately, however, because I believe there is a different and more correct rationale for the decision we reach on both points to which my colleague has written.
I
There can be no question that Michigan is a "no one-man conspiracy” state. Our conspiracy statute is a bilateral conspiracy statute which requires proof of an agreement between two or more persons. It is not, as the people contend, a unilateral…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. AtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Platt v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. KangasMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Zaitzeff v. RaschkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. CainMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. PachecoWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. PannellMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Marquiz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Yedrysek v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.