Legal Opinion

People v. Anderson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1983No. 68053, (Calendar No. 6)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.

I agree with my colleague that the Court of Appeals erred reversibly in this case when it set aside the defendant’s conviction for conspiracy to commit murder. I am constrained to write separately, however, because I believe there is a different and more correct rationale for the decision we reach on both points to which my colleague has written.

I

There can be no question that Michigan is a "no one-man conspiracy” state. Our conspiracy statute is a bilateral conspiracy statute which requires proof of an agreement between two or more persons. It is not, as the people contend, a unilateral…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. AtleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Platt v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. People v. KangasMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Zaitzeff v. RaschkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. CainMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PachecoWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. PannellMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Marquiz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Yedrysek v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API