People v. Anthony
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The questions for the determination of the jury were close ones. The case must be reversed because of an error in the instructions to the jury. The crime charged was rape in the first degree. It was established that the complainant, aged fourteen years at the time of the alleged commission of the crime, had become pregnant. The court was requested to charge by defendant’s counsel: “ I ask your Honor to charge that the pregnancy of the complainant is no corroboration of the crime charged here. The Court: I refuse to charge it in those words. I will charge that they are to consider it together…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Armstrong v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- People v. . FlahertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- People v. CroesNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- People v. . TaleisnikNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- People v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. ByrnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. LinzyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. NashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Ruth " S " v. George " S "New York City Family Court · 1970
- People v. DunbarNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.