Rhodes v. Wilkins
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Justice.
Plaintiffs brought suit for specific performance of a purported option agreement to purchase approximately 1.862 acres of land and damages for a claimed breach of this agreement. A copy of the purported agreement, which is illegible in part, was attached to the complaint. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The motion was sustained upon the ground that the purported agreement violates the Statute of Frauds in that it does not “contain a sufficient description of the land to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Pitek v. McGuireNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- Komadina v. EdmondsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Adams v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Hughes v. MeemNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pacheco v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Balboa Const. Co., Inc. v. GoldenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
- Sorrells v. Bailey Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- UNIV. OF POLICE OFF. ASS'N v. Univ. of NMNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- University of New Mexico Police Officer's Ass'n v. University of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.