Hamilton v. Harry L. Hussmann Refrigerator & Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The suit is to recover the statutory penalty for failure to enter satisfaction on the record of a mortgage, on request in writing; the debt being “fully paid or satisfied.” Code 1923, §§ 9023, 9024. Upon the issue of payment in full vel non, the evidence, without conflict, showed: The mortgage was given to secure a series of 12 notes, payable monthly, aggregating $710, with interest at 6 per centum per annum. As they became due, the notes werfe collected through a bank. In each case an item of interest was figured and paid along with the principal. After all the notes were thus taken up, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. McGuireSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Mayhall v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Martin v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Scales v. Rosenbush Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Porter v. Tate Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kearley v. CowanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Wills v. CleghornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926