Legal Opinion

Wills v. Cleghorn

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 4, 1926No. 7 Div. 661PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was for the statutory penalty for failure to satisfy the record of a mortgage executed by several mortgagors. The trial resulted in a nonsuit, with a bill of exceptions, because of the sustaining of the defendants’ motion to exclude the notice for satisfaction, because it was not signed by all of the mortgagors. Section 9023 (4898) of the Code; Wilkerson v. Sorsby, 201 Ala. 182, 77 So. 708; Butler Co. v. Brooks, 204 Ala. 195, 85 So. 778; Jowers v. Brown Bros., 137 Ala. 582, 34 So. 827; Jarratt v. McCabe, 75 Ala. 325; Scott v. Fields, 75 Ala. 419; Grooms v. Hannon, 59 Ala. 510;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grooms v. HannonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Scott v. FieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Jarratt v. McCabeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Butler Cotton Oil Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Wilkerson v. SorsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API