Legal Opinion

E. L. Wiegand Division v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 13, 1981No. Nos. 79-2836, 80-1399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

I

This matter is before us on cross-petitions for review filed by the Union and employer and the NLRB’s cross-application for en*465forcement. It arises from the employer’s action in terminating payment of sickness and accident (hereafter “S and A”) benefits to disabled employees during a strike by the bargaining unit of which they were members. The National Labor Relations Board found that the employer’s action constituted an unfair labor practice and ordered that the employer make such retroactive payments to each employee disabled as of the beginning…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. AbumayyalehCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. E. L. Wiegand Division, Emerson Electric Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union, United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, (Uaw), Local 1020 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Bailey v. Ferndale Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API