Legal Opinion
Kiehne v. Purdy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 21, 1981No. 51932, 51961 and 51987PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, Justice.
Hilda Kiehne brought this securities action in district court against her former broker, defendant Purdy, and two brokerage firms, E. F. Hutton (“Hutton”) and Shearson Loeb Rhoades (“Shearson”). Plaintiff seeks to recover damages resulting from defendant Purdy’s alleged mishandling of her account while he was an employee of Hutton and Shearson, respectively, on the grounds of common law fraud, breach of contract, and violations of the Minnesota Blue Sky Law. Minn.Stat. ch. 80A (1980).
Based upon plaintiff’s written agreements to arbitrate this dispute, the defendants sought an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Prestressed Concrete, Inc. v. Adolfson & Peterson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Dunlap v. WildCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Sandefer v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ackerberg v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Fogarty v. PiperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Hayden v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Fairview Cemetery Ass'n of Stillwater v. EckbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,266 Kristie A. Fogarty v. Richard D. Piper and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., Judy Fogarty Arzt v. Richard D. Piper and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.