Legal Opinion

Hamann v. American Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1983No. Docket 67682PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction, based upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens. We find no error and affirm.

This action arises from an accident in which plaintiff Michael Hamann was allegedly injured when the Jeep which he was driving rolled over. Plaintiffs are residents of Tennessee, and the accident occurred in Tennessee. The sole basis for plaintiffs’ decision to file this action in Michigan was the fact that defendant American Motors Corporation (of which the other two defendants are wholly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sexton v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cray v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Anderson v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Severine v. Ford Aerospace & Communications Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sutherland v. Kennington Truck Service, LtdMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bellin v. Johns-Manville Sales CorpMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Russell v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. McLARTY v. KUBOTA TRACTOR, LTDMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API