Russell v. Chrysler Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In these cases, the defendants attempted to invoke the doctrine of forum non conveniens. In one action, the circuit court granted a motion to decline jurisdiction; in the other, such a motion was denied. On appeal, the Court of Appeals treated the doctrine as inapplicable on the ground that the corporate defendants are residents of Michigan. Because the doctrine is not subject to such a limitation, we remand these cases to the Court of Appeals for further consideration.
I
In Russell v Chrysler Corp, plaintiff Thomas P. Russell was seriously injured in a January 16, 1986, accident in the State…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Silver v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Gore v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Cray v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Anderson v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Radeljak v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Abbott v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
- Barnes v. International Business MacHines Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Barnes v. International Business MacHines Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Radeljak v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.