Charlie Thomas Courtesy Ford, Inc. v. Sid Murray Agency
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOUNG, Justice.
By this suit on account, the Sid Murray Agency, an insurance agency, sought to recover insurance premium payments and attorney’s fees from Charlie Thomas Courtesy Ford, Inc., an automobile dealer. The dealer interposed three primary defenses: accord and satisfaction, settlement, and statute of limitations. After a non-jury trial, the trial court in its judgment granted to the plaintiff recovery for unpaid premiums, but denied to it recovery for attorney’s fees. The defendant has appealed. From that part of the judgment about premiums, the appellant-dealer complains on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Van Zandt v. Fort Worth PressTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Jenkins v. Henry C. Beck CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Meaders v. BiskampTexas Supreme Court · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rizk v. Financial Guardian Insurance Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
- 1st Coppell Bank v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Solis v. Evins, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- Hycarbex, Inc. v. Anglo-Suisse, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- Blue Bell, Inc. v. IsbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.