Legal Opinion

White v. Raleigh Wyoming Mining Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1933No. 7050PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatct-ieR, Judge:

This action was brought by the assignee of scrip stamped “Not transferable”, to recover of the obligor in money. The scrip was issued in 1930 tinder Acts 1927, chapter 37, by an employer to his employees, in payment for labor performed. The circuit court sustained a demurrer to the declaration.

The Act of 1927 provided that non-transferable scrip should be issued “upon request of any employee”; that it should be “redeemable in merchandise only by the employee to whom issued”; and should be taken as a promise by the obligor to pay “to the employee to whom issued, in lawful…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. State v. GoodwillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. State Road Commission v. County Court of Kanawha CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. Peel Splint Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. International Text-Book Co. v. WeissingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atlas Powder Co. v. Nelson & Chase & Gilbert Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Linkups Invest & Trade Co. v. China Market U.S.A., Ltd.Norfolk County Circuit Court · 1997
  4. State of West Virginia v. Michael and Kim BlattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Memorial Gardens Development Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API