Legal Opinion

State v. Winstandley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1900No. 18,682PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Erom the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

— Indictment in two counts for embezzlement. Motion to quash each count sustained. The State appeals.

In substance, it is charged in, the first count that at, etc., and on, etc., William L. Breyfogle, Isaac S. Winstandley, and Clarence J. Frederick, each then and there being officers, agents, and employes of a certain banking company known as the New Albany Banking Company, which banking company had been theretofore organized under the laws of the State of Indiana, and which said banking company was then and there carrying on a banking business in the city of New Albany, Indiana, the same…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Colip v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. State v. WingoIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. State v. WinstandleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. EnsleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Vinnedge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Green v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API