In re Rouss
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Charges against respondent of professional misconduct by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, P. J.:
The respondent was admitted to practice in 1898, and since that time has practiced in this department. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York now charges the respondent with professional misconduct upon the following facts: On December 24, 1912, in a criminal proceeding before a magistrate of the city of New York, Eugene Fox, a member of the police force of said city, was arraigned on the charge of having feloniously received $100 from one George A. Sipp upon the agreement that said Fox would not arrest said Sipp on a charge of keeping a disorderly house. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bar Ass'n v. CaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Matter of KaffenburghNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- In re SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- In re BolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Matter of SpenserNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re NeumanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- In re RoussAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915