People v. Arbogast
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld
Following a jury trial the defendant was convicted of delivering less than 30 grams of a controlled substance, MDA (111. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 56/2, par. 1401(b)). He was sentenced to 3 years’ probation with the first 360 days to be served as periodic imprisonment, and fined *3500. He appeals, contending that the record raises the defense of entrapment and that the State has not proved him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in view of that defense. He also complains that various evidentiary rulings together with the remarks of counsel deprived him of a fair trial.
The State’s witnesses established…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. HowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. HendrixIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. KentIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- The PEOPLE v. PetoIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. KlineIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. CrossIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. FranklinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- People v. KuelperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- People v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.