Legal Opinion

People v. Cross

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1979No. 51201, 51230, 51256PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kluczynski

The primary issue raised in these three consolidated cases is whether the appellate court properly held that entrapment exists as a matter of law whenever a government informer supplies a controlled substance to an individual who is later prosecuted for the sale of that substance. Defendant Odie Cross, Jr., was convicted in a jury trial of the unlawful delivery of less than 30 grams of a substance containing heroin (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 56½, par. 1401(b)) and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of two to six years, defendant Tom Haywood was convicted in a bench trial of the unlawful…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. The People v. StrongIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. People v. MayberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. People v. FriedmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. PlacekIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. TiptonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People Ex Rel. Daley v. SuriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API