Legal Opinion

Navajo Mining & Development Co. v. Curry

California Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1905No. S.F. No. 4254PublishedCited by 1 opinion

PETITION for Writ of Mandate to Charles F. Curry, Secretary of State. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is an original proceeding in which a California corporation seeks to compel the respondent to file and issue certificates of increase of its capital stock. An alternative writ of mandate was issued upon the filing of the petition, and the respondent submits the controversy upon his general demurrer thereto, for want of facts to justify the issuance of the writ.

The facts are, that the petitioner having been originally organized with a capital stock of only seventy-five thousand dollars, became desirous of increasing the amount to one million dollars. To carry out this object a meeting of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Riesterer v. Horton Land & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hyde v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API