Looz, Inc. v. Ormont
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, Chief Judge.
On May 6, 1947, the plaintiff, an Illinois corporation, began using the trade name of “Looz” in conjunction with a saline cathartic. On August 19, 1948, it applied to the United States Patent Office for its registration as a trade mark. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1051 et seq. It was allowed on December 4, 1951. The mark consisted of four block letters, the end letters being about twice the size of the two center letters. Above the two center letters in the mark is the portrait of a girl in a circle, the circle being shaded on the inside. The statement, as finally allowed, read:
“Looz,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Champion Spark Plug Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dresser Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. Heraeus Engelhard Vacuum, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Laskowitz v. Marie Designer, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Haeger Potteries, Inc. v. Gilner PotteriesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Travelodge Corporation v. SiragusaDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1964
- Harms, Inc. v. Tops Music Enterprises, Inc. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.