Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
Southern California Edison Company (“Edison”) appeals two orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) interpreting the “small power production facility” provision of § 3(17) of the Federal Power Act to permit such a facility to use fossil fuels to supplement alternative fuels in a manner not expressly authorized under the statute. 1 Edison contends that § 3(17)(A) & (B), on which FERC relied, is unambiguous, and conse: quently the two orders cannot stand. FERC, in response, contends that § 3(17)(B) is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. ShalalaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Fag Italia S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Bobreski v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Stewart v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- United States Ass'n of Reptile Keepers, Inc. v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.