Legal Opinion

Peterson v. City of Fort Worth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1998No. 2-97-270-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

I.INTRODUCTION

Appellant Sandra L. Peterson (Peterson) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Fort Worth (the City) in her premises liability action. In a single point, Peterson contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the City because the eondition was a special defect as a matter of law. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

II.FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On February 7, 1994, Peterson stepped into a “hole” created by a break in a steel plate that covered a shallow drainage channel that traversed the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Centeq Realty, Inc. v. SieglerTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Fort Worth v. GayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. City of El Paso v. Chacon, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  3. Texas Department of Transportation v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. Harris County v. Estate of Ciccia, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2004
  5. Brazoria County v. Van Gelder, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API