Legal Opinion

(PS)Fitten v. Whitley

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 13, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00513Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 STEVEN M. FITTEN, No. 2:21-cv-00513 TLN AC (PS) 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER and 15 JOHN E. WHITLEY, Acting Secretary of FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS the Army, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly 20 referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Before the court is defendant’s 21 motion to dismiss the complaint as time barred. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the 22 motion (ECF No. 11), a motion to…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API