Legal Opinion

Huber v. Brown

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1897No. 2511PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County. — Hon. John R. Winn, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

Respondent brought this action to recover the value of certain stock killed by an engine and cars of the appellants’ railroad. The complaint alleges the value of the stock killed to have been $135. The prayer was for $2JO and attorney’s fees. The complaint was evidently drafted under ch. 128 of the Laws of 1893 (p. 418), § 3 of which provides for the recovery of double damages, and § 4, for attorneys’ fees. These sections of the act were held unconstitutional in Jolliffe v. Brown, 14 Wash. 155 (44 Pac. 149, 53 Am. St. Rep. 868).

*5At the trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jolliefe v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Henry v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Gabriel v. Seattle & Montana Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Croft v. CroftWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Moore v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Dodge v. CorlissWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Wockner v. SpingeltWashington Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API