Wockner v. Spingelt
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
— This suit began as an action in replevin to recover possession of an automobile or for the sum of twenty-seven hundred dollars, the alleged value thereof, together with attorney’s fees in the sum of four hundred dollars.
The action grew out of a dispute between plaintiff and defendants as to the contract price for the automobile. Plaintiff alleged that the contract price was $2,805.62 and that $1,772.10 had been paid thereon, leaving a balance of *825$1,033.52 which was due. Defendants, in their answer, alleged that the contract price was $2,717.62, and that, after the payment of $1,772.10, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baker v. OliverWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Durk v. ScullyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Huber v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Moore v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Dodge v. CorlissWashington Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bishop v. HamletWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Bishop v. HamletWashington Supreme Court · 1961