Legal Opinion

Wockner v. Spingelt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1954No. 32737PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

— This suit began as an action in replevin to recover possession of an automobile or for the sum of twenty-seven hundred dollars, the alleged value thereof, together with attorney’s fees in the sum of four hundred dollars.

The action grew out of a dispute between plaintiff and defendants as to the contract price for the automobile. Plaintiff alleged that the contract price was $2,805.62 and that $1,772.10 had been paid thereon, leaving a balance of *825$1,033.52 which was due. Defendants, in their answer, alleged that the contract price was $2,717.62, and that, after the payment of $1,772.10, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baker v. OliverWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Durk v. ScullyWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Huber v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Moore v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Dodge v. CorlissWashington Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bishop v. HamletWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Bishop v. HamletWashington Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API